Paula(Ire)
03-18-2005, 07:51 PM
I've just finished reading a book by a war correspondant, and Irish man called Fergal Keane. Towards the end, he writes about being asked to give evidence at the trial of one Sylvestre Gacumbitsi, the man who incited thousands of Hutus to massacre thousands of Tutsis in the grounds and buildings of a church in Nyarubuye, Rawanda. Ten years after this genocide, Gacumbitsi was convicted, and sentenced to thrity years in prison.
I was interested in what Fergal Keane wrote about human rights and justice, in that it comes from a man who witnessed the unimaginable consequences of mans total brutality to man. 'Inhumanity' is too tame a word for what happened in Rawanda.
He writes:
"Had the genocide happened twenty years ago... there would certainly have been no prosecutions. But something did change after Rawanda and then Bosnia. The decade in which I came of age as a reporter of war became a time of mobilisation for human rights activists and believers in international law.
"After Iraq and with the terrible abandonment of Darfur, it is easy to think that international law is bunkum. The powerful or the most ruthless decide how things will work.
"I disagree. The infrastructure of international justice is small; the pressures not to investigate the powerful nations of the world for human rights abuse are great. But there is a community of conscience - organised, passionate but also practical - which will not go away.
"In matters of human rights there isn't the option of despair. You recognise the contradictions, the hypocrisies, the defeats, but you go on. There is no other civilised choice."
THAT LAST PARAGRAPH IS WELL WORTH READING TWICE.
There is no other civilized choice, and despair just isn't an option... I find that very helpful.
Love to you all,
Paula
I was interested in what Fergal Keane wrote about human rights and justice, in that it comes from a man who witnessed the unimaginable consequences of mans total brutality to man. 'Inhumanity' is too tame a word for what happened in Rawanda.
He writes:
"Had the genocide happened twenty years ago... there would certainly have been no prosecutions. But something did change after Rawanda and then Bosnia. The decade in which I came of age as a reporter of war became a time of mobilisation for human rights activists and believers in international law.
"After Iraq and with the terrible abandonment of Darfur, it is easy to think that international law is bunkum. The powerful or the most ruthless decide how things will work.
"I disagree. The infrastructure of international justice is small; the pressures not to investigate the powerful nations of the world for human rights abuse are great. But there is a community of conscience - organised, passionate but also practical - which will not go away.
"In matters of human rights there isn't the option of despair. You recognise the contradictions, the hypocrisies, the defeats, but you go on. There is no other civilised choice."
THAT LAST PARAGRAPH IS WELL WORTH READING TWICE.
There is no other civilized choice, and despair just isn't an option... I find that very helpful.
Love to you all,
Paula